What Does the NCLGS Proposed Model iGaming Act Mean for Players?

According to former Florida state senator Steve Geller, the proposed bill, which was introduced to Congress at the July 2024 annual meeting of the NCLGS, has seven guiding principles. They include revenue generation, responsible gaming, addressing cannibalization concerns, advertising guidelines, licensing requirements, age limits, and data sharing.  

The draft proposed a gambling age limit of 21 for adults, a 15%–25% tax on gross gaming revenue, and state regulatory boards.

What the NCLGS Proposed iGaming Act Includes

There are some interesting details in the model legislation: 

Ban on Sweepstakes  

Sweepstakes games are specifically outlawed by the draft — it defines them as games of chance with a dual-currency structure mimicking a casino. The move is intended to end unregulated, untaxed games but, according to industry insiders, the proposed penalties ($10,000 to $100,000) are not strong enough. 

Limits on Operators and Wagers  

The idea is that states could set maximum iGaming license amounts and establish a bidding system. It also grants regulators the authority to dictate maximum wager limits, an issue that has been contested in jurisdictions such as Massachusetts. These are steps to improve player safety but operators might object. 

Funding Restrictions  

It would prohibit credit cards as a funding source for user accounts, but prepaid cards and e-wallets would be acceptable alternatives. This is standard practice across multiple states, but it poses a technical challenge for operators with multi-state platforms. 

Focus on Responsible Gambling  

The draft stresses responsible gambling with deposit and bet caps, government-funded treatment programs, and AI detection of gambling addiction. Yet advocates have also objected to the fact that no dedicated funding has been set aside for such programs. 

Advertising Guidelines  

Other restrictions would prohibit ads to anyone under 21, and college campus promotions. However, the draft is not near to the kind of tougher bans on advertising already found in some states, like on celebrity endorsements. 

A Template, Not a Solution  

The draft provides a detailed guide, but its content is not exhaustive. In the case of gambling, for example, the proposal to use AI to track gaming activity could be problematic from an operator’s privacy standpoint. Second, in the absence of firm positions on issues such as application fees and tax revenue distribution, there may be room for disagreement at the legislative table. 

The emphasis on reciprocity between states may lead to interstate online poker, but convincing everyone to agree on such a provision will be difficult. The model legislation's parts that become law will be decided based on politics and state nuances. 

Going Forward: A Long Road to Legalization  

Legalizing iGaming has been a long road in the US. Currently, there are only seven states — Connecticut, Delaware, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and West Virginia — that allow online gambling. Negotiations to expand this list fell through in 2024, with Maryland and Ohio advancing legislation, but not getting it. Sports betting, by contrast, is allowed in many more states and shows just how competitive iGaming has become politically and socially. 

NCLGS Council President Shawn Fluharty acknowledged it’s hard to draft a single proposal because of the problem of coordinating legislators across different political and economic realities. Despite the obstacles, the council believes the template will allow states considering iGaming legislation to find a less confusing road ahead. 

Sources: https://igamingbusiness.com/gaming/model-igaming-proposed-legislation-us/

More of what is going on in the regulatory system in the world - here is about Brazil.